Wahhabis, the so called Muslims are not Muslims and will never be, they
were created like Bin laden to control the so called modern Islam, and
to make us hate each other, respect all religions, nations and flags .
| Non-Televised Truth
Photo from Non-Televised Truth ….this is the PSYOP (psychological operation) that A Sheep No More
has been attempting to explain to the masses. All these extremist
groups are CREATED and very WELL FUNDED to make order out of chaos. Pass
it on to all those FAKE alternative media who pimp the "all muslims are
terrorists" lies to you because they have a huge US Christian ZIONIST
population to please, and do not want that audience to be offended and
leave their fake news ($$$$$)!!!!
published on 21/12/2013
Article found on: https://www.facebook.com/ASheepNoMore?ref=stream
I am posting it here for reference so I can look more into this, but also so others may too.
Islamic Fundamentalism (Wahhabism) created by Zionists~
You believe that Islam is the enemy? You believe Muslim Fundamentalism is at the root of all evil?
You are very wrong. The con is massive and the con stretches across the
entire Islamic world also. As much as YOU (We) don’t understand the
conflict NEITHER DO THE TRUE MUSLIMS!
This is why:
Give some thought to the fact “Osama Bin Laden” came from a sect of the
Consider the fact that the majority of the hijackers on 9/11 weren’t
Iranian or Iraqi or even Afghani but were SAUDI NATIONALS!
Consider the fact that the Saudi Royals and their country – while the
rest of the Arab/Muslim world are demonized by the USA and it only takes
ONE guy (Nigerian but boarded a plane in Yemen) to have the USA focus
on “Al Qaeda in Yemen” – is NEVER a target of the USA while the MAJORITY
(yes I repeat it) of the 9/11 alleged hijackers were Saudi nationals!!
What was a member of the house of Saud doing there?
Consider that, for now, it is the Saudis who are in control of the Oil
in the gulf to the greatest degree AND they set the price to the world
(along with their Zionist/American “friends”) while Iran (and Iraq) have
significant oil reserves and are happy to consider LOWER prices!!
Do you never wonder why Saudi does not protest about Israeli nuclear
missiles, while they object to Iranian power plants?
Did you forget that AL SAUD were SADDAM’s biggest supporters to attack
Iran in 1980?
Isn’t it strange that Saudi is very quiet when Israel attacks Lebanon /
Gaza or American/Nato troops kill civilians in IRAQ and Afghanistan?
I COULD GO ON AND ON but I won’t.
Let me just let you chew over this for a moment:
King FAISAL AL-SAUD declared to the WASHINGTON POST on Sept. 17, 1969:
“WE, THE SAUDI FAMILY, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree
with any Arab or Muslim Authority which shows any antagonism to the
Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (Arabia)
is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his
descendants spread out all over the world.”
In the 1960’s the “Sawt Al Arab” Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt,
and the Yemen Broadcasting Station in Sana’a confirmed the Jewish
Ancestry of the Saudi Family ” – James Matthew Cantu
The Saudi Royal Family are Zionist with their origins going back to
MORDAKHAI BIN IBRAHIM BIN MOSHE’.
And Wahhabism is the House of Saud SECT – a total corruption of the
Islamic faith which was promoted by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, founder
of “Wahhabism” an ‘austere’ form of Islam. al-Wahhab arrives in the
central Arabian state of Najd in 1744 preaching a return to “pure”
Islam. He seeks protection from the local emir, Muhammad ibn Saud, head
of the Al Saud tribal family, and they cut a deal. The Al Saud will
endorse al-Wahhab’s austere form of Islam and in return, the Al Saud
will get political legitimacy and regular tithes from al-Wahhab’s
followers. The religious-political alliance that al-Wahhab and Saud
forge endures to this day in Saudi Arabia.
The research of Mohammad Sakher led to an order for his death by the
Saudi Regime for the following findings: The Saudi family, who, despite
claims otherwise, were descended from Jewish merchants from Iraq. Sakhir
found that the Jewish Ancestor of the Saudi family was called Mordakhai
Bin Ibrihim Bin Moshe but changed his name to Markhan Bin Ibrahim Musa.
There are records in the British war Museum that the British paid 15,000
pound sterling per month to the thug Ibne Saud to oppose Muslim
Ottomans and with explicit instructions to share the money with Muhammad
bin Abdul Wahab because he introduced Ibne Saud to the British. The
British ordered Ibne Saud to have a relationship with Muhammad bin Abdul
Wahab and now the present day Saudi family are descendants of both
Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab and Ibne Saud. Also, the british sent a spy
named “Hempher” to convince Muhammed bin abdul wahab to create the
“wahhabi” sect…this was to create groups between muslims and divide
them…..due to this, today all saudis are wahabis.
The House of Saud, therefore, works WITH the US, British and Israeli
elites AGAINST the REAL Muslims of Iraq/Iran etc. The House of Saud
(with their 9/11 hijackers – who, in fact, I do not believe WERE on
those planes) works WITH their Zionist chums to create the vision that
the true Islam is terrorist when, in fact, the House of Saud are Zionist
working with the west and hate the true Islam.
Why? Because the House of Saud – if they did not play this game with the
UK, USA and Israel – would be targeted for regime change as much as
Iraq/Iran and Afghanistan etc. What you need to remember is that, not
only are they Zionist by this ‘austere’ form of religion CREATED by a
zionist BUT they also have a LOT to lose if they don’t play with the
The people of the Muslim world are as confused as we are about all of
this. The Saudi people do not recognise this con. They know as much
(generally speaking) about the history of their country and the history
of their religion and politics as we do. Perhaps less because they are
so controlled and conditioned.
It’s a pure mindf*ck people. It is again, the elites brainwashing the
masses for divide and conquer and this little part of the story goes
back to the Ottoman Empire and why that was destroyed by “us” (“us”
being the Bankers again!).
Now, you may say “But the Saudis and Israelis are mortal enemies and
have fought wars!!”
Yes they have fought wars. Who has died due to them? The House of Saud?
No. We Brits have fought wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. Are the
people of these countries mortal enemies of the people of the UK? Yes IF
you believe the propaganda of our governments. How many of you are
willing to today? How many of you believe Blair should be convicted for
lying to us? And who have died in OUR “wars”? Name a government
official’s child who has died?
A country they refuse to recognise or even negotiate with: Hmmm look
deeper and just read the words of the King again! “Cousins”.
You may point to the Saudis giving safe havens to Hezbollah etc….
Think on this:
Does a government do what it’s people wish? Has ours?
When our government supported the Iraq war and the people didn’t, did
Again, this is nothing to do with Saudi people OR Jewish people. This is
to do with governments and regimes.
When our government threw its people into Iraq and Afghanistan, did it
affect our government? Have any of our government or their families died
in those “wars”? No.
Did any of the House of Saud die in the Saudi/Israeli war? No.
The House of Saud (as with our own government/establishment) manouvre
the pieces of a chess set as and how they wish. The House of Saud will
quite happily give safe haven to organisations which are against the
Israelis while the House of Saud shall support the Israeli regime. But
you can’t get that in your head can you?
As for safe haven? Let’s take a look at one Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad
(Islam4UK Choudary’s chum):
In Beirut, he joined Sheikh Khalil Al-Mat and the local branch of Hizb
Al-Tahrir. Then, in 1983, (or according to some versions in 1979 during
Syria’s invasion of Lebanon) he took the alias of Omar Fustuk and
settled in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where he established “Al-Muhajirun” as a
front for the Hizb Al-Tahrir in the Arabian Peninsula. Al-Muhajirun now
has offshoots in Lille, France, and Hanover, Germany. In 1995, 47 Sunni
organizations were reported to be active in Western Europe under the
umbrella of Hizb Al-Tahrir, which is headquartered in Hamburg.
In 1985, after the Saudi government deported him he then went to London
where he later left Hizb Al-Tahrir following a disagreement with its
leaders. While Bakri wanted to deal with numerous issues troubling the
Muslim community, such as racism and unemployment, the Hizb Al-Tahrir
leaders claimed that such activity would sidetrack the party from its
main goal, the establishment of an Islamic caliphate.
In 1993, Bakri became a legal resident of Britain, and in March 1996 he
applied for citizenship.
So: The Saudis DEPORT the guy and where does he end up going? THE UK!!
So here we have a government (the British Government) accepting a “known
terrorist” who has been “thrown out” by the Saudi government and given
him SAFE HAVEN in the UK.
So according to this idea of Saudi giving safe haven to terrorists, just
as the Saudi government are evil because they give safe haven to what
you describe as terrorist organisations and people, can’t we now say the
same for OUR government?
Does that make the UK and its people (who have no say) a terrorist
Think through the logic!!
So, basically, what I’m telling you is this: the entire terrorism threat
is being orchestrated by the Zionists within Israel/Mossad, the USA/CIA
and Britain itself along with help from Saudi Arabia in the form of the
house of Saud (Saudi Royal family) who wish to retain their positions
as Kings of the Middle East while collaborating with the Western Zionist
There is a long time established and very respected organisation by the
name of the CATO Institute based in Washington D.C. I happen to have
come across a document of theirs dated 1992 which is a Policy Analysis
of the US Government and the title of the document is “The “Green
Peril’: Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist threat”.
Again, I repeat, this is 1992.
Here are excerpts which, I hope, when you make a comparison of what I
have just discussed you may well then appreciate the reality of it.
You may also clearly recognise that, if you were also to read “The Grand
Chessboard” by Zbigniew Brzezinski and the PNAC document “Rebuilding
America’s Defences”, you would have no shadow of a doubt about the con
which is being played out in manipulating YOUR belief that we have a
TRUE Muslim threat. For we never have.
Excerpts: (oh, by the way, it’s written by Leon T Hadar, a former bureau
chief for the Jerusalem Post).
Now that the Cold War is becoming a memory, America’s foreign policy
establishment has begun searching for new enemies. Possible new villains
include “instability” in Europe –ranging from German resurgence to new
Russian imperialism– the “vanishing” ozone layer, nuclear proliferation,
and narcoterrorism. Topping the list of potential new global bogeymen,
however, are the Yellow Peril, the alleged threat to American economic
security emanating from East Asia, and the so-called Green Peril (green
is the color of Islam). That peril is symbolized by the Middle Eastern
Moslem fundamentalist–the “Fundie,” to use a term coined by The
Economist–a Khomeini-like creature, armed with a radical ideology,
equipped with nuclear weapons, and intent on launching a violent jihad
against Western civilization.
“Islamic fundamentalism is an aggressive revolutionary movement as
militant and violent as the Bolshevik, Fascist, and Nazi movements of
the past,” according to Amos Perlmutter. It is “authoritarian,
anti-democratic, anti-secular,” and cannot be reconciled with the
“Christian-secular universe” and its goal is the establishment of a
“totalitarian Islamic state” in the Middle East, he argued, suggesting
that the United States should make sure the movement is “stifled at
The Islam vs. West paradigm, reflected in such observations, is
beginning to infect Washington. That development recalls the efforts by
some of Washington’s iron triangles as well as by foreign players during
the months leading up to the 1990-91 Persian Gulf crisis. Their use of
the media succeeded in building up Saddam Hussein as the “most dangerous
man in the world” and as one of America’s first new post-Cold War
bogeymen. Those efforts, including allegations that Iraq had plans to
dominate the Middle East, helped to condition the American public and
elites for the U.S. intervention in the gulf.
There are dangerous signs that the process of creating a monolithic
threat out of isolated events and trends in the Moslem world is already
beginning. The Green Peril thesis is now being used to explain diverse
and unrelated events in that region, with Tehran replacing Moscow as the
center of ideological subversion and military expansionism and Islam
substituting for the spiritual energy of communism.
Islam does seem to fit the bill as the ideal post-Cold War villain.
“It’s big; it’s scary; it’s anti-Western; it feeds on poverty and
discontent,” wrote David Ignatius, adding that Islam “spreads across
vast swaths of the globe that can be colored green on the television
maps in the same way that communist countries used to be colored red.”
NOW THIS NEXT PART IS AN AMAZING PIECE OF HONESTY (and REMEMBER, this
was 1992 only MONTHS before the first WTC bombing which the brought the
“threat” of “Islamic Militism” to light. Completely and utterly
The creation of a peril usually starts with mysterious “sources” and
unnamed officials who leak information, float trial balloons, and warn
about the coming threat. Those sources reflect debates and discussions
taking place within government. Their information is then augmented by
colorful intelligence reports that finger exotic and conspiratorial
terrorists and military advisers. Journalists then search for the named
and other villains. The media end up finding corroboration from foreign
sources who form an informal coalition with the sources in the U.S.
government and help the press uncover further information substantiating
the threat coming from the new bad guys.
In addition, think tanks studies and op-ed pieces add momentum to the
official spin. Their publication is followed by congressional hearings,
policy conferences, and public press briefings. A governmental policy
debate ensues, producing studies, working papers, and eventually
doctrines and policies that become part of the media’s spin. The new
villain is now ready to be integrated into the popular culture to help
to mobilize public support for a new crusade. In the case of the Green
Peril, that process has been under way for several months.
The Israeli government and its supporters in Washington are also trying
to play the Islamic card. The specter of Central Asian republics and
Iran equipped with nuclear weapons helps Israel to reduce any potential
international pressure on it to place its own nuclear capabilities and
strategy on the negotiating table. More important, perhaps, the Green
Peril could revive, in the long run, Israel’s role as America’s
strategic asset, which was eroded as a result of the end of the Cold War
and was seriously questioned during the Gulf War.
NOW on the specific point of the House of Saud:
As has that of Egypt and Israel, Saudi Arabia’s use of the Green Peril
to mobilize U.S. support has been characterized by confusion, ironies,
and paradoxes, the most dramatic of which has been the kingdom’s own
commitment to Islamic fundamentalism. With the elimination of Iraq as a
regional military power, the Saudi royal family, worried about the rise
of Tehran as a hegemonic player in the gulf, has been fanning the
anti-fundamentalist and anti-Iranian mood in Washington. The Saudis have
indicated that they are interested in countering Iranian influence in
Central Asia. Ironically, they are doing what they accuse Tehran of–
spending lavishly to establish political and religious influence. Riyadh
has spent more than $1 billion to promote the Saudi brand of Islam.
Along with Egypt, Saudi Arabia has also been supporting the Somali
president against a faction, supported by Iran, that is trying to
A series of reports about resurgent militant Islamic forces in Saudi
Arabia (which also portrayed the royal family as a politically reformist
regime and active supporter of the U.S.-led peace process) has been
used to try to mobilize American support for the Saudis as a “moderate
pillar” and anti-fundamentalist force in the gulf, the Middle East, and
The problem with that campaign is that the legitimacy of the Saudi
regime is based on its own Islamic fundamentalist principles. The Saudi
government is actually more rigid in its application of Islamic law and
more repressive in many respects than the one in Tehran. For example,
Saudi Arabia has no form of popular representation, and political rights
are totally denied women and non-Moslems. The Saudi regime has been
able to stay in power largely because it has had both direct and
indirect American military support, most recently during the Gulf War.
To paraphrase President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Saudis are Islamic
fundamentalists–but they are our Islamic fundamentalists.
Just read that last line again! “but they are our Islamic
Full paper here: http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-177.html
House of Saud: On America’s side. On Britain’s side. On the Israeli
side. The WESTERN DEMOCRACY BASED IMF SIDE.
So they will supply the Wahhabi sect of “Muslim Fundamentalism” which
is, in fact at the core, Zionist in nature to support the Western
democratic aim to undermine the Muslim world. And how better to do that
than to demonise the Muslim world by presenting them as the terrorists.
THEY ARE NOT.
Just like the Irgun before them, the Mossad and their collaborators
within the CIA and MI6 etc etc are doing the terrorism job on behalf of
the west and the media, ignorantly mostly, supports that agenda because
the people who own the media are also?….. Zionist…. and all for
supporting the Western democratic agenda.
You might think “Well that suits me because I’m western and I don’t want
Islam” but you are completely missing the point. The only REASON Islam
is affecting you is because our own elites are creating it to ensure
they get the reaction from you that they need to justify the further
control of you. You are supporting your own oppression!
The U.S. Department of Defense has released translations of a number of
Iraqi intelligence documents dating from Saddam’s rule. One, a General
Military Intelligence Directorate report from September 2002, entitled
“The Emergence of Wahhabism and its Historical Roots”, shows the Iraqi
government was aware of the nefarious purposes of the Wahhabis of Saudi
Arabia, often known as Salafis, in serving Western interests to
The report relies heavily on the Memoirs of Mr. Hempher, which describe
in detail how a British spy to the Middle East, in the middle of the
eighteenth century, made contact with Adbul Wahhab, to create a
subversive version of Islam, the notorious sect of Wahhabism, which
became the founding cult of the Saudi regime. The movement was
temporarily suppressed by the Ottomam armies in the middle of the
nineteenth century. But with the assistance of the British, the Wahhabis
and their Saudi sponsors returned to power and founded their own state
in 1932. Since then, the Saudis have collaborated closely with the
Americans, to whom they owe their tremendous oil wealth, in funding
various Islamic fundamentalist organizations and other American covert
operations, particularly the "jihad" in Afghanistan. But the Saudis
simulatenously use the immense wealth at their dispossal to disseminate
this disruptive brand of Islam to various parts of the world,
categorized by some of the largest propaganda campaign in history.
Many who defend Wahhabism as a legitimate reform movement of Islam have
tried to dismiss the Memoirs as a spurious fabrication. These include
Bernard Haykel, Professor in Near Eastern Studies at Princeton
University, who, without providing any evidence, presumes the Memoirs to
have been created by Ayyub Sabri Pasha.
However, while the Memoirs only emerged in the 1970s, Pasha wrote his
version of the story already in 1888. Ayyub Sabri Pasha was a well-known
Ottoman writer and Turkish naval admiral, who served the Ottoman army
in the Arabian Pensinsula, writing several works about the region and
it's history. Including The Beginning and Spreading of Wahhabism, where
he recounts Abdul Wahhab's association and plotting with Hempher.
In addition to that revealed in the Hempher Memoirs, the Iraqi
intelligence report also makes known some surprising claims, derived
from works circulated in Arabic which have not been translated into
English. As the report recounts, both Abdul Wahhab, and his sponsor, ibn
Saud, who founded the Saudi dynasty, were of Jewish origin.
For example, D. Mustafa Turan wrote, in The Donmeh Jews, that Muhammad
ibn Abdul Wahhab was a descendant of a family of Donmeh Jews from
Turkey. The Donmeh were descendants of followers of the infamous
false-messiah of Judaism, Shabbetai Zevi, who shocked the Jewish world
in 1666 by converting to Islam. Viewing it as a sacred mystery, Zevi's
followers imitated his conversion to Islam, though secretly keeping to
their Kabbalistic doctrines. In Europe, the Shabbeteans were eventually
led a century later by Jacob Frank, claiming to be a reincarnation of
Zevi. And, according to Rabbi Antelman in To Eliminate the Opiate, to
them belonged the Rothschilds who had a hand in the founding of the
Bavarian Illuminati. The Donmeh community of Turkey were concentrated in
the city of Salonika, which became a hotbed of Masonic activity, and
from which the Young Turk movement evolved, which aided in the collapse
of the Muslim empire of the Ottoman Turks. There is evidence that
Ataturk himself, the founder of the modern Turkish state, was of Donmeh
origin as well.
Turan maintains that Abdul Wahhab's grandfather, Sulayman was actually
Shulman, having belonged to the Jewish community of Bursa in Turkey.
From there he settled in Damascus, where he feigned Islam, but was
apparently expelled for practicing sorcery. He then fled to Egypt and he
again faced condemnation, so made his way he to the Hijaz, where he got
married and fathered Abdul Wahhab. According to the report, the same is
claimed in The Donmeh Jews and the Origin of the Saudi Wahabis, Rifat
The notion of the Saudi family being of Jewish heritage has been
published by Mohammad Sakher, who, it is claimed, was ordered killed by
the regime for his revelations. The report relates a similar account,
but from different sources. According The Wahabi Movement/The Truth and
Roots, by Abdul Wahhab Ibrahim Al-Shammari, for example, ibn Saud is
actually descended from Mordechai bin Ibrahim bin Mushi, a Jewish
merchant from Basra. Apparently, when he was approached by members from
the Arabian tribe of Aniza, then claimed to be one of them, and traveled
with them to Najd and his name became Markhan bin Ibrahim bin Musa.
Additionally, Abdul Wahhab was descended from Wahib Al-Tamimi, so, as
reported by al Said Nasir, in The History of the Saud Family, the Saudi
ambassador in Cairo, Abdullah bin Ibrahim al Mufaddal, paid Muhammad
Al-Tamimi thirty five thousand Jinee in the year 1943, to forge a family
tree of the Saudi family and that of Abdul Wahhab, and merge them into
one, claiming their origin from the Prophet Mohammed.
While it would be difficult to independantly authenticate these claims,
they are interesting in light of the role that the state of Saudi Arabia
has and continues to play with regards to supporting and advancing
Western power in the Middle East and elsewhere. Especially astounding is
the very dubious and virulent form of Islam, that Wahhabism and
Salafism represent, which is currently wrecking havoc on Islamic
traditions, and dividing the Muslim community in petty squabbles over
trivial details, allowing the War on Islam to proceed effectively
The Birth of Al-Wahabi Movement and Its Historical Roots
The Khazarian Conspiracy