Monday, 9 February 2015

Racism disguised as concern

Today I read something that really got me questioning, and although I had already realised that the main British media is totally corrupted, what I read today really shows the extend some groups are trying to create stereotypes and discrimination.

Under the disguised of concern for the Rotherham victims, The Times published an article by Melanie Phillips today Monday 09/02/2015.

According with Phillips, the issue is not that most of the men involved where from Pakistani origin, but because there were Muslim. Since when has all child abuse cases been connected with Pakistanis or Muslims? Is a certain member of the Royal family also a Muslim? Are the BBC, Parliament or pedophile Vatican priests also Muslims? And these are just a few that have recently also been on the news.

But Phillips goes on and on, with twisted words trying to use a serious issue for the purpose of creating discrimination, hate and segregation.

Many events labelled as "terrorist attacks by Muslims", like the attacks in France, have been faked. Many videos are being posted by non-Muslims to show what the main media is trying to hide from us. And many of these false flag events have more than one purpose.

Part of the event was to build up public acceptance that in the name of Freedom of Speech it is OK to have "journalists" publishing HATE MESSAGES and causing open discrimination against Muslims and the religion of Islam.

I am not one for religion and personally have issues with any group or authority figure that tries to impose something that does not resonate with me as being.

Many British people, like me, feel no need to accept a religion, but sadly they have replaced it with faith in the "news". Some people will accept anything they are told without questioning, that is true for religious extremism and brain-washed-newspaper-readers-extremists.

But as some still buy into the sheep heard mentality, many more are awaking up everyday.

As main media outlets keep desperately trying to persuade public opinion, their desperation is so clear it gets people questioning: Why are they trying so hard to demonize all followers of Islam?

I have no doubt that the timing the "authorities" decided to expose the issues in Rotherham where carefully planned, these "authorities" had another agenda and that is why no action was taken before. They waited for when it suited them to bring the issues to the public via the twisted lenses of the main media.

The article in question has done nothing to assist the victims in Rotherham or anywhere in the world. Blaming a religious group for one event that sadly happens around the world, a vile social issue that also includes the rich, the white, the Vatican and those of "royal blood" as the perpetrators.

Update:  06 March 2015
The IPSO is suppose to: "handles complaints about breaches of the Editors' Code of Practice. We operate a new complaints procedure that is designed to achieve speedy and fair resolution of your complaints. We are able to impose new sanctions, including the ability to determine the nature, extent and placement of corrections, when they are necessary in order to remedy a breach of the Editors' Code." I submitted a complaint after reading the article mentioned above via their website and in my personal experience, the process seems to be designed to make it hard for me to have my complaint heard. Therefore I am posting the communications between myself and the IPSO staff here.

Get to know the IPSO:

Email received 09/02/2015

Your complaint

Type of complaint: Behaviour of a journalist and/or photographer
Type of complaint: Material published in a newspaper or magazine
Date story was published: Monday 09 February, 2015
Publication: the times
URL of article (if appropriate):
Publication has been contacted?: No
Publication headline: we must say the unsayable about rotherham

How the Code has been breached

Clauses breached

Clause 12 (Discrimination) The article published by the times is offensive even to non Muslims like myself. It's discriminating against the religion of Islam and clearly suggests all Muslim man are potential sex abusers. 

Email received 10/02/2015
Thank you for contacting the Independent Press Standards Organisation.
Your complaint is currently being assessed, and we will be in touch with you again shortly. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions.
Should IPSO decide that your complaint falls outside of our remit, or does not raise a possible breach of the Code, we will write to you to explain why and send a copy of our letter to the publication.
Alternatively, if we decide that the concerns you have raised fall within our remit and raise a possible breach of the Code, and you have not previously exhausted the publication’s internal complaints procedures, a copy of your complaint and any other correspondence you have sent to us, including contact information, will be sent to the publication to provide it with the opportunity to resolve the matter directly with you.
A copy of the Editors’ Code of Practice, which is administered by IPSO, can be found at
Please note, in addition, the following information about our confidentiality and data protection procedures:
Confidentiality: The system of self-regulation requires good faith on both sides.  In order for us to be able to investigate complaints effectively, it is essential that neither party to a complaint, complainant or newspaper/magazine, publishes information which has been provided as part of the investigation - most notably correspondence – without the consent of the other party.  Publication, without consent, may affect our ability to continue to deal with a complaint or may be considered when we reach a decision as to whether the Code has been breached. Material provided by both complainants and publications during an investigation must only be used for the purpose of the complaint to us. This will not generally prohibit a publication from publishing details of any ruling.
Data protection: By pursuing the complaint, you consent to the processing of any personal data which may be provided for the purposes of dealing with your complaint.  You also consent to the publication of any decision in relation to the complaint, but may withdraw consent in writing.
Further information about complaining to IPSO, including a summary of the complaints procedure, can be found at:
With best wishes,
and second email received 10/02/2015

I write further to our earlier email.
Before we proceed, I would be grateful if you could provide us with a copy of the article under complaint or, if it appears online, a link to the article.
We look forward to receiving this information, and would appreciate your response within the next seven days.
Best wishes
email received 19/02/2015
Further to our email of 10 February, we have yet to receive a response. We would be grateful to hear from you as soon as possible, so that we can proceed. 
If we have not received the information requested within the next seven days, we will close our file on this matter.
Best wishes
Reply 20/02/2015

Thank you for your email, but frankly I am disappointed that your organisation needs me to send a copy of the article otherwise no further action will be taken.
I did not keep a copy of the paper, but I expect that the people that are supposed to deal with complains about newspapers to be have access to UK newspapers. I provided the name of the article and date. Why would you not be able to have access to this information? You have not yet investigated my complaint because I did not sent a copy of the newspaper???
What is the point of that??? Who are you regulating??? Please advise what is the purpose of your organisation. I complaint about an article in The Times on the 09/02, I would have expected that your organisation would investigate it with immediately effect.
I trust that the IPSO do have access to all articles printed and published recently by The Times newspaper. I expect my complaint to be assessed within days of being reported.  
But then if you do decide that my complaint is valid, you will them send a copy to the Times so I can resolve the matter with them. I ask again, what is the purpose of the IPSO?
Please send me the details of how to complaint the service provided by IPSO. Please can you also send me further information who funds the IPSO and how are the investigations carried out the IPSO regulated.
Kind regards
Email received 23/02/2015

Thank you for your email of 20 February.
As I am sure you will appreciate IPSO receives a very large number of complaints about a variety of articles. As such, we require complainants to provide a copy or link to the article, and explain how they consider the Code of Practice to have been breached.
In this case, we have been able to find the following article; I would be grateful if you could confirm that this is the article about which you wish to complain.
IPSO is the new independent regulator for the newspaper and magazine industry in the UK. It is funded by its members.
We look forward to receiving this information, and would be grateful for your response within the next seven days.
Best wishes
Reply 26/02/2015
Thank you for your reply. I can confirm that is the article in question. I look forward to hear from you shortly.
Email received 26/02/2015

I write further to our earlier email.
We are currently in the process of assessing your complaint in full. IPSO is moving offices, and we would like to make you aware that there is a possibility of some delay during this period.
We will be in touch with you about your complaint in due course. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any further questions or concerns.
Best wishes,
Email received 04/03/2015 - cc The Times
Thank you for contacting the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) regarding your complaint about an article headlined “We must say the unsayable about Rotherham”, published by The Times on 9 February 2015.

On receipt of a complaint, IPSO’s Executive reviews it to ensure that it falls within our remit, and discloses a possible breach of the Editors’ Code of Practice. The Executive has now completed an assessment of your complaint under the terms of the Code. Having considered the points you have raised in full, we have concluded that your complaint does not raise a possible breach of the Code.

You held the view that the article discriminated against Muslims and that it suggested that all Muslim men are “potential sex abusers”, in breach of Clause 12 (Discrimination). Clause 12 protects identified individuals against discrimination based on their race, colour, religion, gender or sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability. Your complaint did not relate to an identified individual. As such, your complaint did not raise a possible breach of Clause 12.

Whilst we note your view that the article was offensive, the Editors’ Code of Practice does not address issues of taste and offence. The Code is designed to address the potentially competing rights of freedom of expression and other rights of individuals, such as privacy. Newspapers and magazines have editorial freedom to publish what they consider to be appropriate provided that the rights of individuals – enshrined in the terms of the Code which specifically defines and protects these rights – are not unjustifiably infringed.

You are entitled to request the Executive’s decision to reject your complaint be reviewed by IPSO’s Complaints Committee. To do so you will need to write to us within seven days, setting out the reasons why you believe the decision should be reviewed. Please note that we are unable to accept requests for review made more than seven days following the date of this email.

We would like to thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider the points you have raised, and have shared this correspondence with the newspaper to make it aware of your concerns.

Best wishes,
Reply 06/03/2015

Please accept this email as my request to have the Executive’s decision to be reviewed by IPSO’s Complaints Committee.
I have used your organisations website to place my initial complaint. Upon placing my complaint only a number of selections was offered to identified the reason for my complaint. There were not sufficient clauses and, at the time I selected the most fitting category in according with the message portrait in the paper in question.
I selected Clause 12 (Discrimination), and it is discrimination against all individuals followers of the Islamic fate. The way the description for clause 12 suggesting that identified individuals is actually in line with my complaint. It does not say identified individuals by name or only one individual, and all the individuals followers of Islam have been discriminated and identified by the article in question, specially the male followers of Islam. Please see below some of the articles lines and provide an clear explanation to why the IPSO does not agreed that all individuals Muslims have been identified in the article.
What is the clause for Religion discrimination? I don’t remember seeing that on the choices provided by your website because it should be there.
I am very disappointed at the time it took for my complaint to be reviewed under the excuse that I did not provide a copy of the paper. I also received emails suggesting that if I did not send the copy of the newspaper within so many days then my complaint would be dismissed. Again with your email below, you state that if I do not respond within the time set that this complaint will be dismissed. Yet you took your time dealing with my complaint while giving me a short time to reply or be dismissed without further opportunity to appeal.
It is very clear to me how the IPSO is working to protect the newspapers. Please also refer to the email I sent to your colleague on the 20/02/2015 on this matter.
As part of my request to have my complaint review, please provide a full explanation to the following;
Example 1 - identified men of Pakistani heritage:
Last summer’s Jay report found
that at least 1,400 children in
Rotherham, mainly white girls from
troubled backgrounds, were
enslaved, sexually attacked and
prostituted by gangs of
overwhelmingly Pakistani-heritage
Example 2 – identified Muslim
both the Casey and Jay
reports themselves bow to political
correctness by failing to
acknowledge that the cultural factor
behind the Rotherham grooming
gangs is not that they are Pakistani
but Muslim
Example 3 – identified Muslim men as being attackers, does not say some Muslims, the language used suggest all Muslims men
It’s not Pakistani Christians,
Hindus or atheists who are involved
in these crimes. Nor is it just white
girls who are targeted: Sikhs have
been complaining for years that their
girls are attacked by Muslim men
Example 4 – identified Muslims, this statement is clearly being used to create discrimination
reason is that in Muslim society
women are treated as inferior people,
and non-Muslims are widely
regarded as trash.
Example 5 – identified Islam, RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION plain and simple and therefore relates to all individual followers of Islam
The issue is
not minority ethnicity. It’s Islam,
the greatest PC unsayable of the lot

I want a detailed explanation to why the statements above will not be consider discrimination against all individuals of the Islamic fate.

I am looking forward to your reply.

Thank you.