Pages

Monday, 31 August 2015

GMO Soy in Brazil = Killing the Rainforest

Monsanto, World Wildlife Fund Team Up to Greenwash the Amazon Rainforest With GMOs


monsanto gmo soy rainforest
Is there a connection between the top wildlife conservation fund and Monsanto? The answer may surprise you.
In today’s day and age there are so many charities and foundations out there that choosing the right ones to support, and to trust for that matter, can be especially problematic.
A lot of people just give to the ones that are best known like the WWF, Susan G. Komen and others without knowing where their money really goes. 
While most charities do their fair share of good work, they also can have plenty of dark secrets.
Some are money hoarders whose CEOs bring home the big bucks while spending comparatively little on research or actual work on the ground.
Others are simply too bloated and internally divided to be effective.
And still others have been getting away with far worse: they spend their time fraternizing with the enemies causing the very same problems they’ve been been supposedly working to solve for decades.
The WWF-Monsanto Connection
With its signature panda logo and history of doing good work on behalf of animal welfare across the globe, the World Wildlife Fund For Nature (WWF) has become one of the most recognizable charities of all-time.
Started in 1961, its stated mission is to conserve ecologically important regions and their wildlife.
But if that’s their true aim, then why has the WWF partnered with one of the most notorious nature killers in the world, Monsanto, whose products have been blamed for widespread monarch butterfly and honeybee deaths?
The world’s favorite wildlife charity was called out in a recent book titled ‘PandaLeaks: The Dark Side of the WWF,’ an exposé from German journalist and filmmaker Wilfried Huismann on everything from questionably high salaries to the organization’s ties to — you guessed it — the Big “M,” agrochemical giant Monsanto.
The book was a sequel of sorts to Huismann’s documentary ‘The Silence of the Pandas’ about the skeleton’s in the WWF’s closet.
A book titled 'PandaLeaks: The Dark Side of the WWF' was released in fall 2014. Click here to learn more.
A book titled ‘PandaLeaks: The Dark Side of the WWF’ was released in fall 2014. Click here to learn more.
The book immediately became a best-seller when it hit store shelves in 2012, but it almost never even saw the light of day because of opposition by the WWF’s legal team.
Terrified of the allegations within linking them to everything from commando hit squads in Africa to promoting Monsanto’s GMO crops, the WWF managed to stop the sale of the book for several weeks due to a massive campaign.
A series of lawsuits followed, but they were ultimately unable to prevent Huismann’s controversial book from being released.
Contained within the book within is a cavalcade of secrets including WWF’s relationship with Monsanto, whom the WWF admitted they took money from according to one German newspaper.
As stated on the website GMWatch, the friendly panda logo-clad charity actually collaborated with Monsanto to create something called the “Round Table on Responsible Soy.”
The campaign has been criticized as being a covert exercise in Monsanto’s patented brand of “greenwashing,” which calls GMO soy a “responsible” choice for protecting the environment despite much independent evidence to the contrary.
In other words, the countless people across the world who donate 20 bucks or more per month to the WWF are actually funding a charity with ties to what many call the most evil corporation in the world.
Despite mass protests, the WWF has refused to back down from their support of Monsanto’s genetically engineered soy and continues to post the Monsanto-approved campaign on its website.
GMO Soy: A Grave Threat to the Amazon Rainforest
While most GMO crops are grown in just six countries, two South American giants, Brazil and Argentina, have become hotbeds for soy production, with most of it being grown with genetically modified seeds from Monsanto and other companies.
The native Amazon Rainforest and other lands have suffered at the hands of the GMO soy boom: between 2007 and 2008 almost 3 million acres of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest was destroyed because of illegal logging, soy plantations and cattle ranching.
The grave situation led to a documentary release by Greenpeace titled ‘Soy: In the Name of Progress’ which you can watch at the bottom of this article.
According to the chart below from GMO Compass, Brazil’s soy industry has been virtually taken over by GMOs, which critics say threaten biodiversity in the rich and vitally important Amazon Rainforest.

gmo soy
Cultivation of GMO soy worldwide according to GMO Compass. Brazil is now at 90+% with much of it threatening biodiversity in the Amazon Rainforest.

The clearing of new areas of rainforest land for GMO soy has decreased in recent years thanks in large part to grassroots boycotts, but large-scale plantings have continued, as soy is especially valuable for use in feed for chickens, cows and other animals that are consumed for food.
Spreading the Word: WWF and Monsanto
So, what can we do?
For now, the best option is to spread the word and expose the truth, in hopes of a day when we can actually trust our charities to do the right thing. 
If you support WWF with your dollars or know anyone else who does, please share this article and consider finding another way to help make a difference.
We need all the help we can get, that much is for sure
source: http://althealthworks.com/7527/monsanto-world-wildlife-fund-team-up-to-greenwash-the-amazon-rainforest-with-monsantos-gmo-soy/



Sunday, 30 August 2015

Newborn cloth diapers / nappies





diy-cloth-wipes-tutorial

Petition UK Goverment - Asylum Seekers

Petition 

Accept more asylum seekers and increase support for refugee migrants in the UK.

There is a global refugee crisis. The UK is not offering proportional asylum in comparison with European counterparts. We can't allow refugees who have risked their lives to escape horrendous conflict and violence to be left living in dire, unsafe and inhumane conditions in Europe. We must help.

 https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/105991

Still Using Tampons Or Pads? You Should Read This



 

Still Using Tampons Or Pads? You Should Read This

Jul 17 • Articles, Breaking Stories, Health and Beauty • 64128 Views • Comments Off

1What is something that every woman has to endure in her lifetime? You got it, a menstruation cycle. On average a woman will have her period once a month, for about 5 days, for around 40 years of her life! During this time, we need to use various products stay clean and fresh. There has got to be a market in there! The Tampon and Pad industry is a $718 Million dollar market, and tampons and pads are necessities. This got me questioning the production and ethical value behind these products.
They are mass-produced, and heavily marketed and cheaply made, out of bleached rayon and plastics. Why is it that we never see ads for the much safer alternatives such as cotton products, reusable washable pads and menstruation cups? Any of these alternatives are much more economical and are about a gillion times safer for the environment. Up until a few months ago, I didn’t even know that there were alternative products, or even think that there was any potential risk from using generic menstruation products.
Almost all sanitary napkins and tampons are made with bleached rayon, cotton and plastics, how safe do you think that material is to be inside or very close to your Vagina? Not to mention these products leave behind fibers in your vagina that can cause bladder, vaginal infections, and Toxic Shock Syndrome. Tampons are also known to absorb the natural fluids and bacterias that the vagina produces to stay clean and healthy.
Let’s look at the #1 ingredient in generic tampons and sanitary napkins: Rayon. Rayon is a fiber that is made from cellulose fibers, cellulose is a natural fiber, but to produce Rayon chemical procedures are needed that include: carbon disulphide, sulfuric acid, chlorine and caustic soda.
Side effects from exposure to too much Rayon can include: nausea, vomiting, chest pain, headaches and many others. Rayon is not just found in tampons and pads, but a lot of clothes are made from it as well. Sanitary napkins also contain quite a bit of plastic, which does not allow sufficient air flow ‘down there’ so in turn can also cause an array of infections. Tampons and pads are also bleached using chlorine, which results in the production of dioxin, which is linked to breast cancer, endometriosis, immune system suppression and various other ailments.
A menstrual cup is my first choice for a tampon/ pad alternative. It is a flexible silicone cup that is inserted into the vagina. Essentially this cup catches all the blood and you empty it every 12 hours during your cycle and reinsert it. I know what you are thinking… gross. That’s what I thought too; my initial thought was that this sounded so disgusting that I would never use it.
I guess that changed as I researched all of the positive effects that came from using a cup. If it is properly inserted and taken out there is no reason that you should ever have to actually touch blood, but even if you do, what’s the harm? Just wash your hands, you big baby.
It may take a few cycles to get the hang of how to use one of these cups, but once you do you will wish you had started a lot sooner! I recommend that you continue to use pads or liners until you have mastered the insertion technique, just in case. Not only will you save a lot of money using a menstruation cup, but you will be doing a huge favor to the environment as well.
Think about it, If an average women uses about 17,000 pads or tampons during her entire menstruation period, x that by 3.5 billion women in the world, and yeah, you do the math…. Another great thing about using menstrual cups is that many women have reported to having less severe cramping during their period! I know that alone would encourage some women to making this change. Some brands of menstrual cups are: ‘DivaCup,’ ‘MoonCup,’ ‘Ladycup’ and ‘Lunette,’ among many others.
There are also reusable pad products are made of safe materials that come with washable highly absorbent inserts to suit all different levels of flow. These would be a great option to women that do not like to products that you have to insert. These reusable ‘pads’ are made with safe breathable materials to keep your area healthy, and leak free! Some brands that are available today are: ‘Luna Pads,’ ‘Glad Rags,’ ‘Pleasure Puss’ and you can also make your own.
3Now, if you are just not so keen on ever having to really see blood or wash your products, or don’t like these options there is another option, sit in a lake for your entire cycle. You will eventually come out very cold and wrinkled, but at least you won’t be throwing away tons of crap into the environment and you don’t have to worry about toxic chemicals being leached into your body…. Just kidding!
OK, there is one last alternative to generic tampons and pads. There are some companies that make natural organic cotton products that do not leach chemicals, and do not leave synthetic materials behind. These can still absorb your natural fluids and they are still not the best things for the environment, but at least cotton is a more natural substance that can biodegrade much quicker and safer. Some brands of these products are: ‘Seventh Generation,’ and ‘Natracare.’
So there you have it! I hope that this article opened up your eyes to the health effects and environmental hazards that are associated with using pads and tampons, and made you reconsider what products that you are using. There are many websites that provide information with reviews on all of these products, do your research and find what’s best suited for you and your lifestyle.
Reference: http://lunapads.com/http://www.natracare.com/Default.aspxhttp://divacup.com/
Source: Collective Evolution

Breast Cancer Awareness

I Will Not Be Pinkwashed: Why I Do Not Support Susan G. Komen for the Cure

http://butterbeliever.com/i-will-not-be-pinkwashed-why-i-do-not-support-susan-g-komen-for-the-cure/

Pinkwashing America

It’s October.
And that means, it’s prime pink season. It’s national “Breast Cancer Awareness Month.”
It’s that magical time of the year when shades of pale pink are plastered onto every product, every container, every conceivable gadget or gizmo that the Susan G. Komen Foundation can get their hands on.
When that iconic symbol of overlapped ribbon is supposed to adorn every man, woman, and child who ever had a mother, grandmother, sister, daughter, niece or aunt who faced the horrifying struggle of breast cancer.
But I am not buying it.

Susan G. Komen: For Cure or Con?

Susan G. Komen for the Cure is a multi-million-dollar company with assets totaling over $390 million dollars. Only 20.9% of these funds were reportedly used in the 2009-2010 fiscal year for research, “for the cure.” Where does the rest of the money go? Let’s have a look. As you can see, the largest chunk of the pie is going toward “Public Health Education.” More on that later, but for now I’d like to take a look at the millions spent on “administrative costs.”

Show Me the Money

Here is a section from Susan G. Komen’s Form 990 from 2008 showing the salaries of some of their highest-paid employees. I’ve included the heading of the page to show what the numbers in the columns represent, but cut out the board members listed as having no salary. Er, “Reportable” salary…
Note the dates of employment for some of the lesser-paid employees. Gary Dicovitsky, VP Development, for example, was paid $95,291 (plus $2,746) only from 10/08 to 3/09.
Gary must have gotten a promotion since then, though. Because while it still lists his position as VP Development from 10/08 – 3/09, his salary from 2009 was $417,109. Oh, plus $18,091 in change.
I don’t know about you, but I would never expect directors of a charitable “non-profit” organization to have a higher salary than most doctors, lawyers, or even politicians.
Screenshot from their 2009 Form 990, straight from Komen.org:
Curiously, these were the only employees listed in this type of form, similar to the 2008 one. Other employees were not listed with their position title.
In all, about 11% of Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s annual revenue goes toward employee salaries. And that adds up to a lot of money. But what about the rest?

“Public Health Education”

Is this really making a difference?
The area in which Komen spends the highest percentage of funds is in “public health education,” in other words, bringing awareness to the population of the disease itself and the importance of screening for early detection of breast cancer. While that may be considered a worthwhile goal to some, it’s important to realize that Komen stands to profit off of spreading that message.
They admit to about 10% of funds used for “fundraising,” but let’s be honest, the pink-ribbon-plastered “awareness” and”education” campaigns are often little more than a highly effective form of advertising — which in turn, brings in Komen’s millions. In other words, a way to raise funds, for themselves, while getting a pat on the back for their efforts to “save lives.”
One thing that doesn’t quite compute with me is how Komen’s mission of finding a “cure” — after all, that is their name — is congruent with putting over half their money toward promoting awareness and screening, for early detection of breast cancer. It’s not curing breast cancer to be aware that you could get it, nor is finding out that you have cancer and treating it in the early stages in hopes of entering into remission. That’s not a cure. Yet that is Komen’s largest promoted focus.
So what do they do to accomplish their mission of finding a cure for breast cancer?
"Promise Me" perfume, plugged by Komen to fund their cause, contains known, potent carcinogens so dangerous, they are banned by the International Fragrance Association.
“Promise Me” perfume, plugged by Komen to fund their cause, contains known, potent carcinogens so dangerous, they are banned by the International Fragrance Association.

Research “for the Cure”

The first thing that pops into my mind when I think of a charity giant such as Komen funding research to prevent disease, is pouring money into Big Pharma’s pocketbook. After all, our only hope of a cure for cancer is that magical drug or vaccine that pharmaceutical corporations will one day rescue us all with, right?
Of course not.
But the reality that research in the conventional medical world is put toward, well, conventional medicine (allopathic drugs) remains. For me, this begs the question — where exactly does your research funding go, Komen?
SGK had the following to say regarding accusations that their organization funds pharmaceutical research:
“It’s been reported that Susan G. Komen for the Cure provides funding to pharmaceutical companies.  That is simply not true.  We have never funded pharmaceutical company research – our grants, totaling $450 million, have gone to research institutions in the U.S. and abroad.” – Susan G. Komen for the Cure
Ohh… okay. So you would never provide funding to pharmaceutical companies that sell disease-promoting, toxic chemical drugs to cancer patients.
But take their money? Sure!
“The Komen Foundation owns stock in General Electric, one of the largest makers of mammogram machines in the world. It also owns stock in several pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca (now AzkoNobel).
AstraZeneca has long been a Komen booster, making educational grants to Komen and having a visible presence at the Race For the Cure. At the 1998 Food and Drug Administration hearings, the Komen Foundation was the only national breast cancer group to endorse the AstraZeneca cancer treatment drug tamoxifen as a prevention device for healthy but high-risk women, despite vehement opposition by most other breast cancer groups because of its links to uterine cancer.
The organization’s biggest sponsors are — surprise! — the corporations that profit from cancer through chemotherapy and radiation. To them, Komen for the Cure isn’t really about finding a cure for cancer; it’s about promoting cancer so that they can sell more drugs and radiotherapy that keeps more patients locked into a cycle of dependence on toxic cancer treatments.” -Well put, Natural News.
(Did you catch that bit about poisoning healthy women with the carcinogenic cancer drug, Tamoxifen, as a preventative measure? Yeah. Moving on…)
Susan G. Komen does indeed provide millions of dollars to fund research — but what exactly are they researching with those grants? One blogger diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer who had serious doubts of the intentions of the Komen foundation, dug through the research grants herself, and found the following information about how Komen’s research money is spent:
Now, of those categories being researched, which sound like they are actually focused on curing breast cancer?
Early detection? No.
Prevention? No.
Treatment? No. (that would be drugs used to treat symptoms.)
The only conceivable categories related to finding a cure for the cancer being researched would be etiology (the study of causation), survivorship, model systems, and biology.
So to break it down even further, Susan G. Komen for the Cure only spends a possible 53% of it’s research funding for a cure, or — about 11% of total revenue. Donate a dollar “for the cure?” Only about a dime of that will go toward research that might actually be designed to cure cancer, through allopathic medicine that is driven by the pharmaceutical system.

Think Before You Pink” **

Incredibly, this actually happened.
Komen receives over $55 million dollars in annual revenue from corporate sponsorships, from such health-minded companies as Coca Cola, General Mills, and KFC — that’s right — the fast food joint contributing to American society with buckets of diseased and tortured birds fried in genetically modified toxins. Buy a bucket of junk food, and pretend as though you’re helping to save lives while you slowly take your own!
Pink ribbon products are everywhere. But how much good is it really doing to support the fight against breast cancer by purchasing them?
As it turns out, not much.
If only about a dime of every dollar is spent on research for a cure, then just imagine how miniscule of a contribution is being made for that cause when such a small portion of the pink proceeds go toward Komen as a whole.
“It’s rarely more than a penny on the dollar,” said Trent Stamp, executive director of Charity Navigator, a charity watchdog group. “It’s just great advertising.”
Pinkwashers are clearly not just in it for the noble cause. The companies that sell these products are well aware that promoting themselves as supporters of breast cancer awareness leads to better public perception and increased profits.
Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy  explains that, “The makers of some pink products donate proceeds only for a limited time. These products may command a higher price tag, and sometimes they will remain on sale after the donation period ends — even with the higher price.”(L.A. Times)
In addition to limiting the amount of time that portions of pinkwashed proceeds will be donated, product manufacturers also usually put a cap on the total amount of money that will be donated. If that limit has already been reached by the time you buy your pink product, your purchase isn’t contributing a thing. But the company sponsoring Komen continues to proudly sport the pink persuasion anyway, in hopes that you’ll buy into it.
**The Breast Cancer Action organization has created a project to educate consumers about the deceitfulness of pinkwashing, or cause marketing of pink ribbon products. They promote awareness of this issue with the Think Before You Pink campaign, aimed especially at highlighting the pink products which themselves are cancer-causing or dangerous to your health, such as toxic cosmetics, rBGH-laced dairy products, and air-polluting cars. The BCA is doing great work toward fighting the pinkwashing scam and is actually a breast cancer organization I believe should be supported, if any!

Bullies “For the Cure”

Did you know that Susan G. Komen for the Cure spends nearly a million dollars annually suing small charities over the use of the word “cure” in their charitable endeavors? Komen’s general counsel, Jonathan Blum, had the following to say regarding a legal battle of Komen’s which threatened to shut down a small lung cancer organization for the use of the word “cure” in their name:
“We see it as responsible stewardship of our donor’s funds.”
“Responsible.”
Yeah.
Cause when I donate money to a charity, I expect them to use it to dismantle other charities that don’t have millions of dollars to spend on harassing others. Thanks so much for being a good steward of my donations, SGK.

Do we really need breast cancer awareness anyway?

In my not-so-humble opinion, cancer “awareness” is a ridiculous goal invented by deceitful organizations such as SGK to profit off of the American public — make sure you’re “aware” that you could potentially get breast cancer! So that you can go and get yearly mammograms that cause cancer (and make lots of money for us!), then once you get it, you can come right back for unbelievably expensive and toxic treatments that will only keep you alive long enough to squeeze out from you every last penny that you’re worth!!
Sorry. This stuff really bothers me.
The only thing I would advocate as far as the “awareness” train goes would be the importance of self breast exams. Obviously, you should always be looking out for changes in your body that might signal illness. But if I were to discover anything suspicious, I would be very, very careful about just who I put my potentially ill body in the hands of — I certainly would not want a conventional doctor to swoop in like a vulture and push a bunch of dangerous and nonsensical “treatments” down my throat that will only make me sicker and cause me to live miserably.

STOP the lies — there already are cures for cancer.

Breast cancer, along with other cancers, are being treated and cured successfully every day with alternative therapies, and have been for quite some time. But do big corporations and organizations like Susan G. Komen stand to profit off of those treatments? Of course not. So we aren’t hearing about them!
I’ll soon be sharing some of the more successful holistic, alternative cancer treatments (hint: most of them are centered around real food NUTRITION!) that have been curing patients without a single dose of chemotherapy or radiation. Or a pinkwashed product!
But even modern advancements in safe and effective cancer cures are being found — and thwarted by the FDA and the pharmaceutical giants (in which Komen has monetary stock, remember?) which support such government agencies.
I strongly encourage everyone to watch the documentary film, Burzynski the Movie: Cancer is Serious Business, for an incredibly eye-opening look into what happens when cancer cures are actually found (their creators are faced with a prison sentence!). The film documents the work of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, a medical doctor and Ph.D. biochemist who has discovered the genetic mechanism that can cure most human cancers. For a limited time, you can actually watch the film in its entirety online for free. Do it!

Prevention is the best cure

More importantly, what the medical establishment fails to recognize is that cancer is largely preventable. And Susan G. Komen for the Cure is no exception to such ignorance. There are no mentions of eating healthy foods, getting proper levels of cancer-preventing Vitamin D, or other factors such as breastfeeding, in any of their “public health education” efforts. Even though these are scientifically proven ways to prevent cancer.
This is not the way to fight breast cancer!
No. We are simply told to accept that our likelihood of getting breast cancer amounts to little more than a genetic rolling of the dice. So we must continue to “hope” for a cure, in case the die are cast unfavorably against us.
The harsh reality is that Susan G. Komen for the Cure is a major player in the multi-billion dollar industry that is cancer. If a cure for cancer is found (or acknowledged), the industry would collapse, and those billions won’t be made anymore.
You’re free to draw your own conclusions, but as for me, I don’t believe that Susan G. Komen’s mission is truly “for the cure.”

What are your thoughts on Susan G. Komen for the Cure? How would you like to see breast cancer awareness changed in this country? What’s the message we really ought to be spreading about this deadly disease?

Saturday, 29 August 2015

7 Natural Cures for Cancer

 8-What-are-the-Top-7-Natural-Cures-for-Cancer

Have you ever heard the names Hoxsey, Burzynski, Gerson and Royal Rife? What about medicinal mushrooms – have you ever seen a commercial for these, or heard an MD or Oncologist speak of them? No, you have not.


Have you ever seen an ad for hydrogen peroxide 35% for cancer prevention and healing, or have you ever heard of this from your doctor? He/she should be talking about your body’s alkalinity and cells receiving ample oxygen.
Have you heard about medicinal cannabis saving people from cancer and the miseries of chemo?
How do you keep the spread of cancer “growing”? Bury the cure. How do you keep 1.5 million Americans “infested” yearly with mutated cells that multiply uncontrollably? You breed cancer in food and medicine. How many years ago did America start this evil strategy to make people sick and deny them the cure? Nearly 100 years. Where did it all really start? The American Medical Association (AMA) and a man named Morris Fishbein, who single-handedly removed nutrition from medical schools in the U.S. and installed a fake seal of approval for harmful lab-made drugs that made cancer worse. What else did Fishbein do? (http://www.v1.thehealingjournal.com)


Just in case you “doubters” and skeptics want some concrete proof, some evidence to take with you on your journey NOT to get cancer, here are some historical, proven facts to help you understand WHY you need to go 100% organic and research and use natural remedies, to build your immunity to disease with superfoods, herbs, tinctures and organic supplements. (http://www.naturalnews.com)
Let’s begin this journey of truth and the not-so-healthy history of medicine in this bold country we call the “Land of the Free.” Let’s begin with the TOP SEVEN CURES for cancer that mainstream media will never admit to, because their advertising money comes from Big Pharma, the GMO Agriculture giants (Monsanto/Dupont/Bayer/Dow Chemical/etc.) and the lobbyists and politicians who make their money off of stocks in cancer therapies that don’t work:
1. The AMA once paid a cancer virus researcher $250K to retire in Mexico and stop working on natural cures:
(http://www.naturalnews.com)
2. Burzynski documentary reveals true agenda of FDA and cancer industry to destroy cancer cures that really work:
(http://www.naturalnews.com)
3. ‘Dying to Have Known’ documentary features Gerson Therapy natural cancer cure:
(http://www.naturalnews.com)


4. Harry Hoxsey: Guilty of Curing Cancer with Herbs:
(http://www.naturalnews.com)
5. Medicinal mushrooms like reishi and chagacan beat cancer:
http://www.naturalnews.com/027308_mushrooms_cancer_medicinal.html#ixzz2jQYlzRIc
6. Marijuana – A cure for cancer?
(http://www.naturalnews.com)
7. Beat cancer with 35% hydrogen peroxide!
(http://www.naturalnews.com)

Pay it forward 100 years

Nearly 100 years ago, the AMA began removing nutritional education from medical schools in America. Medical doctors would no longer understand anything about using food as medicine (or be allowed to suggest it), and all mid-wives, Native American herbalists and natural healers would be referred to in medical journals as “quacks.” The Western Medicine philosophy would soon come to be that no food in the world could ever heal a human being or cure any disease or disorder; in fact, only pharmaceuticals and vaccines would ever be able to make that claim (legally) and get away with it, whether in peer reviews, medical and science journals (JAMA), scientific “studies” or labeled as such on products. (http://www.naturalnews.com)
Currently, it is illegal for any food, herb, tincture or superfood product to say that it cures anything, yet medications advertised on TV since 1997 can say they treat all kinds of diseases and disorders, even though the side effects are horrendous, some of the time including internal bleeding and suicide. (http://www.naturalnews.com)
Mother Nature, on the other hand, has a CURE for everything and also offers prevention and immunity for everything under the sun. Nutritionists and Naturopathic Physicians will tell you all day that organic fruits and vegetables are the key to healing and living a healthy life. A plant-based diet can heal nearly any health problem, and the body is like a machine that fires “on all cylinders” when given the correct fuel. Take this knowledge and be on your way to health freedom and natural living, where you have lots of energy, rarely ever get sick, can think critically all the time, can be spiritual and independent and take care of your family! Follow Natural News and track the truth. Learn and grow from it. Don’t eat cancer. Don’t drink cancer. Be organic. (http://programs.webseed.com)
Sources for this article include:
http://www.v1.thehealingjournal.com
http://www.naturalnews.com
http://www.naturalnews.com
Original Article posted on NaturalNews.com

Hepatitis B Vaccine



Hepatitis B FACTS
Approximately 0.376% of the United States population is infected with Hepatitis B. Most show no symptoms.
Hepatitis B IS NOT spread by sharing eating utensils, kissing, breastfeeding, hugging, holding hands, coughing or sneezing.
Once you recover from Hepatitis B, you develop antibodies that protect you for LIFE and you will never contract Hepatitis B again.
0.00094% of the United States population die from Hepatitis B related complications yearly. (you are 433 times more likely to die in a car crash)
Hepatitis B is mainly spread through sex with an infected partner and by sharing needles with an infected person.
The likelihood of Hepatitis B becoming chronic depends on age, 90% chance if infected as an infant, this drops to 6-10% by age 5.

Hepatitis B Vaccine FACTS
TOXI INGREDIENTS such as amorphous aluminum hydoxphosphate sulfate and formaldehydel
ADVERSE REACTIONS include but are not limited to: vertigo, anaphylaxis reactions, apnea, seizures, encephalitis, Gillian-Barre syndrome, auto immune diseases and many more.
Hepatitis B vaccine is UNNECESSARY, in 1981 the vaccine was introduced, at this time there were less than 500 deaths per year from HepB. By 1991 the vaccine was added to the schedule, by this time the yearly deaths double and stayed that way for many years.
Randomized placebo controlled double-blind studies have NEVER been conducted. Harmful adjuvants like ALUMINUM or a earlier vaccine are used in lieu of a placebo.
If you child gets injured or killed via vaccine, NO ONE can or will be held accountable, not the doctor who administered the vaccine or the vaccine manufacturer. They are legally immune from any fault.
The Hepatitis B Vaccine has not been evaluated for tis CARNINOGENIC or MUTAGENIC potential, or its potential to impair fertility.

Friday, 21 August 2015

The legal system - Santos Bonacci

Santos Bonacci Explaining how the legal system really works... This is a must watch video..

Monday, 10 August 2015

Say NO to vaccines


I am putting this page together to research more about vaccines. Say No to Vaccinations, some doctors don't even know what its made of. We are human beings, we are strong and our bodies are able to heal. Vaccines are not made to help us, its made for commercial reasons.

Vaccines Archives: http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/category/conventional-med/vaccines/

Cancer or Vaccine: 98 million Americans were given polio vaccine contaminated with cancer-causing virus, admits CDC http://www.asheepnomore.net/2013/07/98-million-americans-were-given-polio.html

Article: When you buy Microsoft products, you are now promoting the pharmaceutical industry and its global vaccine agenda. That's the new reality in which we live, where the world's largest software company is "in bed" with the world's largest vaccine pusher.
http://worldtruth.tv/microsoft-buys-eugenics-technology-from-merck/

Petition:
A UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF RESISTANCE TO MANDATORY VACCINATIONS
 http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/a-universal-declaration-of-resistance-to-mandatory-vaccinations/

Sites and Articles:
John Hopkins Institute for Vaccine Safety - Package Inserts
http://www.sayingnotovaccines.com/
http://www.rawforbeauty.com/blog/599-vaccines-have-serious-side-effects-the-institute-of-medicine-says-so-.html
vaccine-induced toxicity  http://www.greenmedinfo.com/disease/vaccine-induced-toxicity
http://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx (USA)

Other / related article / blog:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com
About Paracetamol http://izzyjessbell.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/paracetamol.html
About synthetic vitamins during pregnancy http://izzyjessbell.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/why-is-birth-defect-linked-vitamin-used.html
Forbidden cures http://izzyjessbell.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/forbidden-cures.html
Insect Virus in vaccines http://izzyjessbell.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/insect-virus-vaccine.html
Vaccine Ingredients http://izzyjessbell.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/vaccine-ingredients.html

Videos:



This 2nd part explains how the pharmaceuticals companies get away with what they do:



The criminalisation of parents, do your homework. But how sad that a concerned parent can be arrested by the government for refusing to have children vaccinated. Another of many of the Totalisation process civilians all over the world are being made into criminals.





Being Vaccinated are FEAR MONGERING concepts that only benefits the big pharmaceuticals organisations.





Let healthy food be your medice, relax, laugh, love, drink pure water and play! You are amazing human being, dont let yourself and your loved ones be used or abused by the system.






This next is a playlist from another YT user so check all the videos on the list:


Saturday, 1 August 2015

'Learn Free' (an unschooling documentary)

How to Educate your Kids While Traveling The World - Unschooling / Homeschooling


Unschooling / Homeschooling

As we are expecting our first child, my husband comment to friends that we will consider homeschooling. A simple comment received by negative attitude.

This is very new for us and it is an consideration. I have for a few years watched videos from alternative life styles and once I came across unschooling it was a amazing tool of healing and improvement to me.

I came to realize how so much of the "Fears and Insecurites" that I accepted as being who I am, where nothing more that programs forced upon my young mind as a child. Despised the fact that I do have some good memories from school, I also had a lot of trauma. And all the things in my life that I have trully learned where because I, of my own choice, got a book and read about it.

When we force people, especially children, to do, behave and accept believes, we are robbing them of the opportunity. The opportunity to study what they want to, to be friends with who they want to, to develop their own person and shape their future, to make choices, to have faith.

Many of the people around me are still so trap in the loop of 'do as you were told and fit in', that any suggestion of a alternative life is taken negatively.

It is not that one method is better than another, and in all walks of life, that one choice is the right choice for all the people, or how it was recently put accross to me that "My God is the Right God".

Going to school does not teach you, it conditions you to follow the herd.

Forcing your religions dogmas upon a child does not teach the child to have faith, it creates fear and segragation.

Accepting what the majority does as the norm, only holds you back from being your best.

Unschooling is a process where you become your own teacher and guide, where you will learn who you are and what you want, how to be the best and happiest you can be. And this process is not only for children. We can all benefit from unschooling ourselves.

I have been unschooling myself for a while, and I know I still have a lot of 'material' to cover. For me, it is a healing process, to face the "fear" that does not even exist. It is a empowering process, to realise that I have a choice and that I have the power to accept change. It is awakening, as I learn to trust my inner self and improve in all aspects of my life.

As my child grows and my body changes, I feel I deeper connection to my inner being, and all the preparation and healing I had in recent years.

From accepting change, understanding that control is an illusion, learning about alternative life styles and experiences, actively observing the world around me and how people are shaped by "fear and illusion".

One de-programing step I actively take is to pay attention to my mind, and when I become judgmental of how people behave and what choices they make. It serves as my teacher, as I first recognize what I dont want or like, but that I also have to accept that people are different and are making their own choices, shaping their experience. Before I open my mouth, and tell people how they are wrong or say negative comments like was said to my husband about home schooling, I take the time to read, research, consider the situation, and never forget free will, as all experiences are valid forms of understanding of the soul.

My choices of life style may not suite you, may not be what will make you happy, but to just accept the "norm" as being the only solution is just plain naive.

Just like the main media, people accept what they are told as the only truth. This 'just accept and dont question attitude' is what we "learned" in school. It is sad, disempowering, based on illusions and fear, and creates segragation and lack of free will.

Most people think that are free and make their own choices, but they are simply accepting what is presented to them as being what they want and who they are. That is schooling. It is not just about what subjects you learn and your grades you get in school, it is mainly about how you behave and what you are willing to accept as being normal.

It touches and shapes so many aspect of our lives. It is not that schools are bad, but that most schools are following the same method, like one size fits all, is just to right. We are all different, we cannot all fit in the same box, and curretly if you dont fit in the box you will have little hope your happiness in this life, or so that what you will be told.

Don't accept what I am telling you, just consider it. Look at your own life, how you behave, what you trully believe vs what you simply accept as being true.